
This isn’t simply a lack of knowledge or expertise. The real issue is fragmentation. Responsibility for crypto-related risk is spread across multiple teams—KYC, Transaction Monitoring, Compliance, —without clear ownership. As a result, controls are inconsistent, misaligned, and often ineffective.The consequence is twofold: material client integrity risks remain undetected or insufficiently mitigated, while operational costs continue to rise.This gap becomes critical. Criminal use of crypto is accelerating across money laundering, sanctions evasion, terrorist financing, and fraud. At the same time, banks are under pressure to reduce costs, increase automation, and apply a truly risk-based approach.Without clarity, neither objective is achievable.

CASE EXAMPLE:A retail client is transacting with multiple crypto-asset service providers. Though, the bank has not identified the counterparties as crypto-asset service providers, failing to generate a TM alert for this increased risk. This means:
no investigation of the transaction in TM and possible SAR-filing
no review of the clients risk classification in KYC
underreporting of volume and values of clients transactions from or to high-risk counterparties, like crypto-asset service providers
Incomplete management information
Eric founded Crysk in the autumn of 2023, building on years of experience in senior leadership roles across both banking and crypto. Since launching the firm, he has partnered with leading financial institutions—including Rabobank and ABN AMRO—to design and strengthen executive‑level financial crime controls for crypto.The experience gained from shaping and delivering these multiyear programs forms the foundation of Crypto Control Clarity. This solution enables Crysk to support more clients with proven, real‑world methods rather than theoretical models—bringing clarity, structure, and actionable results to crypto financial‑crime risk management.

